1. Direct Conclusions
What It Means
A conclusion follows only if it must be true based on the given statements.
❌ Do not use outside knowledge.
✅ Use only the information provided.
Quick Rule
Statements
│
▼
Logical Check
│
▼
Must be True?
│
Yes ───► Follows ✅
│
No ───► Does NOT Follow ❌
Example
Statements
- All birds have feathers.
- A swan is a bird.
Question
Does the conclusion “A swan has feathers” follow?
Solution
Visualize the sets:
+-----------------------+
| Birds |
| |
| +---------------+ |
| | Swans | |
| +---------------+ |
| |
| (All birds have |
| feathers) |
+-----------------------+
Since:
- Every bird has feathers.
- Swan is a bird.
Therefore,
Swan
↓
Bird
↓
Has feathers
Answer
✅ Yes, the conclusion follows.
2. Don’t Add Extra Information
What It Means
Many questions try to make you assume facts that were never stated.
Only use the given statement.
Example
Statement
The school closes if it rains heavily.
Conclusion
The school was closed yesterday.
Solution
The statement only says:
Heavy Rain
│
▼
School Closed
But we don’t know whether it rained yesterday.
The school may also close because of:
Holiday
Strike
Power Failure
Festival
Election
Nothing tells us which happened.
Answer
❌ Does NOT follow.
3. Conditional Statements (If…Then)
Basic Rule
If P → Q
Example:
If you pay the fee
│
▼
You receive a receipt
Valid Logic
Pay Fee
│
▼
Receipt
Also valid:
No Receipt
│
▼
No Payment
(Contrapositive)
Invalid Logic
Didn't Pay
│
▼
No Receipt
This is not guaranteed.
Someone may receive a receipt because of:
- refund
- scholarship
- exemption
Example
Statement
If you pay the fee, you get a receipt.
Conclusion A
If you did not get a receipt, you did not pay.
Receipt?
No
│
▼
Payment?
No
✅ Valid
Conclusion B
If you did not pay, you did not get a receipt.
Didn't Pay
│
▼
No Receipt
Not always true.
Answer
- ✅ Conclusion A follows.
- ❌ Conclusion B does not.
4. Multiple Statements
Sometimes several statements are connected.
Connect them one by one.
Example
Statements
- All engineers are logical.
- Some logical people play chess.
Diagram
Logical People
+----------------------------------+
| |
| +-------------+ |
| | Engineers | |
| +-------------+ |
| |
| (Some overlap) |
| +-------------+ |
| |Chess Players| |
| +-------------+ |
| |
+----------------------------------+
Notice:
The chess players may be outside the engineer group.
Possible arrangement:
Logical People
+-------------------------------------------+
Engineers
+---------+
| |
+---------+
Chess Players
+---------+
| |
+---------+
+-------------------------------------------+
Nothing says the two groups overlap.
Question
Does
Some engineers are chess players
follow?
Answer
❌ No.
The chess players could be different logical people.
Common Patterns
Universal Statement
All A are B
A
│
▼
B
Chain Rule
All A are B
All B are C
A
│
▼
B
│
▼
C
Therefore
All A are C ✅
”Some”
Some A are B
A
╲ ╱
X
╱ ╲
B
Never assume:
- All A are B ❌
- Some B are A always gives more information ❌
Only the overlap is guaranteed.
”No”
No A are B
A B
(O) (O)
No overlap.
Tips
- Read exactly what is written.
- Never use real-world knowledge.
- “Some” means at least one, not all.
- “All” creates a complete subset.
- Conditional statements (
If P → Q) do not meanIf not P → not Q. - A conclusion follows only if every valid diagram makes it true. Otherwise, it does not follow.
Premium Content
Unlock Statements & Conclusions Concepts and all premium lessons with a subscription.
From ₹199.99/year — See plans